ASTM C936 PDF

ASTM Designation: C (Reapproved ). STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR. SOLID CONCRETE INTERLOCKING PAVING UNITS1. This standard is. ASTM C/CM Standard Specification for Solid Concrete Interlocking Paving Units. standard by ASTM International, 09/01/ View all product. This standard is issued under the fixed designation C ; the number immediately following the materials for which no ASTM standards exist, shall be previ-.

Author: Kemuro Kagakazahn
Country: Barbados
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Science
Published (Last): 13 October 2010
Pages: 109
PDF File Size: 16.31 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.98 Mb
ISBN: 245-1-23953-271-6
Downloads: 5345
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: JoJorr

In my opinion, the standard is very minimal and the demands of the specifiers and contractors over-ride the of the ASTM standard. Thanks for your valuable comments. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. I am talking about case in middle east. ASTM usually does not get involved in manufacturing processes, but only specifies the minimum standards of the units. Close this window and log in.

The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action. BS mention specifically about face mix concrete pavers.

Standard Specification for Solid Concrete Interlocking Paving Units

Download Now Defense manufacturing is all about project manufacturing and project accounting. Thank you Mr Dick. The psi compressive strength requirement is very low and a manufacturer could not afford to make the minimal units because this would require compromising other factors including handling awtm installation.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! To my knowledge, the the units you have visualized are not the typical “interlocking concrete pavers” that the f936 written for, which is for heavy loads wheel loads than can be carried if installed properly.

  1N4744 DATASHEET PDF

The tensile splitting test is of no value since the pavers never see a similar loading because of the restraint and effects of the surrounding units.

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. Dick Engineer and international traveler interested in construction techniques, problems and proper design. It is informational only and not an official part of the standard; the full text of the standard itself must be referred to for its use and application.

ASTM Standard for Concrete Unit pavers sudhirvasan – If you refer to a standard ASTM or others in your specifications, make sure you understand the specification and note the requirements that are excluded or waived for your specific use. Download Now White Paper: Which abrasion resistance test is more recommended for concrete unit pavers?

Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

ASTM Standard for Concrete Unit pavers – ASTM (testing materials) Code Issues – Eng-Tips

This specification is intended for interlocking concrete pavers used in the construction of paved surfaces and manufactured from cementitious materials, aggregates, chemical admixtures, and other constituents such as integral water repellents. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. The specification also offers guidelines for physical requirements, sampling and testing, visual inspection, and rejection of specimens.

What is common practice in US? Posting Guidelines Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

  ARGONAUTICAS APOLONIO DE RODAS PDF

The face layer does present some problems regarding determining durability testing, but does not preclude the use of a face layer, since it is a standard for type of construction material. This can effect the applicability of this factor based on the testing of the sample you referred to. If yes which standard is referred for this type of pavers?

Perhaps the supplier you mentioned can address the variation if they are active in writing the ASTM c9936. A typical concrete brick could be 12, psi. How important is the split tensile strength test for concrete pavers?

In c36 case, the ASTM contains a requirement that the the length to thickness of the unit be less than 4. This paver is a long one, size mm x 72mm x mm,which has great potential for tensile splitting. Is there any ASTM asm which has mention about face mix type 2 layer semi dry cast concrete pavers? I am working in Kuwait. Defense manufacturing is all about project manufacturing and project accounting. Kindly share your experience and knowledge.

Register now while it’s still free! Are you an Engineering professional? As you said,Tensile split strength has little effect if the pavers are of interlocking type. I agree with you that the ast, is very minimal, but when we deal the subject in construction contracts,though we specify the product with manufacturer name,the reference to International standards becomes mandatory.